Brexit: Expert discusses 'importance' of UK financial services
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters.Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer.Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights.You can unsubscribe at any time.
The EU is having to justify its actions, perhaps more than ever before, in the wake of the coronavirus crisis. Leaders in Brussels have faced widespread criticism for their slow handling of the vaccine rollout, with Italy this week blocking a shipment of the AstraZeneca jab to Australia. For entirely different reasons, Brexit has also raised existential questions for the future of the bloc. And, although Prime Minister Boris Johnson secured a trade deal with the EU on Christmas Eve, future financial services arrangements remain up in the air.
However, despite some City traders fearing for London’s future prosperity, Professor David Blake argued that the Square Mile will continue to thrive.
Further still, he claimed the EU will be left behind as its “increasingly undemocratic and authoritarian” ways become more apparent.
He wrote: “Even before the withdrawal agreement was published, Sir Jon Cunliffe, a Bank of England deputy governor, expressed concern that the Treasury is ‘going to give it all away’ when it comes to City regulation post-Brexit.
“He feared that this would leave the City of London and its regulator, the Prudential Regulatory Authority, as a ‘rule-taker’ from Brussels.
“Reports at the time suggested that relations between the Treasury and the Bank were ‘very, very bad’ as a result of growing distrust.”
He then pointed out that “this is quite remarkable for three reasons”.
He continued: “First, the City of London is the jewel in the crown of both the British economy and the European financial system.”
Second, he added, remaining a “rule-taker” from Brussels would mean the UK “loses the opportunity for better, lighter regulation” and “we will lose our commodities markets”.
Prof Blake noted: “Third, the EU is facing a series of political, economic and financial crises.
“It has become a fundamentally protectionist trading bloc and is no longer a force for global liberalisation.
“It is becoming increasingly undemocratic and authoritarian – as its appalling treatment of Greece in 2015 made clear.
“And to top it all, the euro project will turn out to be the biggest single – and most predictable – failure in global financial history.
“When this happens, the European banking system will collapse. Key Eurozone banks – such as Deutsche Bank, Societe Generale, BNP, Santander, ING and UniCredit – are already in very serious financial difficulties.
“This will be followed by economic catastrophe in the peripheral states of the EU.”
He concluded in his 2019 piece for BrexitCentral: “In view of this, why would anyone in their right mind allow their financial regulations to be dictated from Brussels once the UK leaves the EU?
“If Brussels refuses to accept enhanced equivalence or mutual recognition, then the City is more than capable of ‘going it alone’ – as it has done very successfully for most of its history and as countries such as Switzerland, Hong Kong and Singapore are currently doing.”
EU tipped for breakup as Brexit hits German exports to UK [EXCLUSIVE]
EU warned of trade war over Brexit deal: ‘Will not be accepted!’ [INSIGHT]
Sunak handed plan to unleash ‘Singapore-on-Thames’ for City [ANALYSIS]
The row over equivalence rumbles on, though, and one interested observer could be US President Joe Biden.
Bloomberg’s Elisa Martinuzzi and Marcus Ashworth argued that New York is taking trillions of dollars from London, making it an impossible task for the UK to recover.
They explained: “New trading limits between the UK and the continent have prompted a large chunk of this lucrative work to move across the Atlantic.
“Clawing back the trillions of dollars of activity that’s leaving London, quite literally overnight, could be a long slog.
“With counterparties from the EU now restricted from trading in Britain, and vice versa, dealers and investors predictably resorted to trading more interest-rate swaps in the US, a market that both the EU and the UK still recognise.
“But the degree to which the shift happened, without any obvious market glitches, has caught some participants by surprise.”
According to data compiled by IHS Markit, in the first two weeks of January, US derivative platforms — known as Swap Execution Facilities — saw their total market share jump to 83 percent from 75 percent for US dollar interest-rate swaps.
In euro swaps, the SEFs gained 18 percentage points of market share to reach 39 percent; and even in sterling swaps, the US share jumped to 45 percent from 27 percent.
Ms Martinuzzi and Mr Ashworth added: “In theory, none of these changes in habit is set in stone.
“London and Brussels are still hammering out an agreement on financial regulations that could yet see the EU recognise UK bankers and financiers as ‘equivalent’ to the bloc’s, potentially allowing business to return to pre-Brexit behaviour just as quickly as it changed.
“But it’s relatively safe to say that whatever happens, Wall Street will be popping open the champagne.
“The shift in dollar business from London to the US will be hard to reverse, as will the euro trading, which the EU has repeatedly claimed it wants to bring back within its jurisdiction and, quite rightly, oversee.”
Source: Read Full Article